why this might be a masterpiece


 
Post new topic Reply to topic
   ArchitectureWeek DesignCommunity Forum Index » Architecture Forum
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Landy



Joined: 15 Dec 2005
Posts: 457

PostPosted: Sun Nov 09, 2008 1:04 pm    Post subject: why this might be a masterpiece Reply with quoteFind all posts by Landy

Ryugyong
How many years did it took to build Notre Dame cathedral in France? How long did it took to build the "Sagrada Familia" in Barcelona? How long did it took to build the Parthenon? How long did it took to build Rome? Is it a matter of the name of the architect? This and many other questions make a recent article I read in the Architectural Record on Ryungong the un-finished skyscraper in Korea a very bad one. One articled that completely bashed this unfinished skyscraper giving it a worst building ever label. However I am pretty sure that if it was designed by Michael Graves everybody would be celebrating it as a pragmatic architecture or architecture of geometry. I believe that is a matter of time and probably with the aid of another architect to finish Ryugyong to it's fullest architectural grandeur.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ryugyong_Hotel
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Wdw-dolphin-hotel.jpg



250px-Dprk_pyongyang_hotel_rugen_05_s.jpg


 

 Filesize:  27.77 KB
 Filename:  250px-Dprk_pyongyang_hotel_rugen_05_s.jpg
 Viewed:  36 Time(s)

800px-Wdw-dolphin-hotel.jpg


 

 Filesize:  117.9 KB
 Filename:  800px-Wdw-dolphin-hotel.jpg
 Viewed:  35 Time(s)


Last edited by Landy on Fri Dec 12, 2008 5:46 am; edited 4 times in total
Back to top
View user's profileSend private message    share:   blogger     del.icio.us     digg     slashdot    
solidred



Joined: 05 Jan 2006
Posts: 631
Location: Scotland

PostPosted: Mon Nov 10, 2008 10:12 am    Post subject: Reply with quoteFind all posts by solidred

I think it looks rather wonderful
Back to top
View user's profileSend private messageVisit poster's website    share:   blogger     del.icio.us     digg     slashdot    
Landy



Joined: 15 Dec 2005
Posts: 457

PostPosted: Tue Nov 11, 2008 12:38 pm    Post subject: Reply with quoteFind all posts by Landy

thanks,
I was trying to kick off a debate on the importance of time for architecture. I believe one of the reasons architects seem bitter over architecture is it's overnight construction and castrating it from the actual time that it takes to cook architecture. My believe is that since the industrial revolution and the invention of steel/concrete/eifs/gypsum civil engineering took the role of architecture making us believe that architecture is to be only light weight or worst sustainable. When time ie history has let us know that architecture is not about cheaper "greener" solutions but contributions to the built environment and for some objects of fine art.
ps
I am not comparing it's aesthetic nor it's historic relevance to the parthenon
Back to top
View user's profileSend private message    share:   blogger     del.icio.us     digg     slashdot    
futuristarchitect



Joined: 16 Nov 2008
Posts: 11

PostPosted: Sun Nov 23, 2008 12:23 pm    Post subject: Reply with quoteFind all posts by futuristarchitect

Was wondering why you posted an image of the Walt Disney Swan and Dolphin Hotels, if they are another project and not designed by Ryugyong....by the way, where is an image of the finished project, or what it is to be?
Back to top
View user's profileSend private message    share:   blogger     del.icio.us     digg     slashdot    
sutcac



Joined: 06 Dec 2008
Posts: 4
Location: Arroyo Grande, CA, USA

PostPosted: Sat Dec 06, 2008 4:39 pm    Post subject: Reply with quoteFind all posts by sutcac

The Walt Disney World Dolphin was designed by Michael Graves, I think his point being the similarity of the basic shapes of the buildings and why one is considered the worst and the other celebrated.

Just to play devil's advocate: The industrial revolution has freed men from the drudgery, and sometimes outright slavery, empolyed in the construction of buildings like Notre Dame, and never mind the lack of worker safety in those days.

I would strongly suspect much of the labor for this North Korean behemoth has also been done in near slavery conditions.

Can't have your cake and eat it too.

Also, I don't think you can really be a fair judge of a building one way or another from a small snapshot. You have to go experience the building for yourself.

_________________
Bryce Engstrom:Architect, A.I.A., General Building Contractor
www.engstromarchitecture.com
www.central-coast-project-design-planning-guides.com
Back to top
View user's profileSend private messageVisit poster's website    share:   blogger     del.icio.us     digg     slashdot    
solidred



Joined: 05 Jan 2006
Posts: 631
Location: Scotland

PostPosted: Sat Dec 06, 2008 5:12 pm    Post subject: Reply with quoteFind all posts by solidred

I'm sure sutcac and Landy know they're both right. Or, take it from me: you're both right Smile
What I would contest, though, to lend some weight to Landy's thought, is that if I look at yer average wonderfully-sculpted, full-of-character gargoyle on a gothic cathedral, I don't see the effects of slavery. I see the effects of joyful, hopeful release from drudgery. Take, in comparison, your average modern office building and I see evidence of lifelessness... The modern, progressive, office environment near killed my real, human sensibilities stone dead.
Back to top
View user's profileSend private messageVisit poster's website    share:   blogger     del.icio.us     digg     slashdot    
sutcac



Joined: 06 Dec 2008
Posts: 4
Location: Arroyo Grande, CA, USA

PostPosted: Sun Dec 07, 2008 10:30 am    Post subject: Reply with quoteFind all posts by sutcac

I have never really had, by concious choice, the Dilbert experience in a cubical in an office but had considered your line of thought as I typed. I don't doubt this is true.

But considering your gargoyle reference, I would posit that this type of lovely detailing constituted a small fraction of the overall labor to construct Notre Dame, and done by a lucky, or maybe also a hard working and studying, elite level of worker. Now you can have your gargoyle cast in a factory with the same level of detail. Does this make it less joyful? Would most even know if was cast and not laboriously sculpted?

So I think we have not properly embraced what the industrial revolution can bring to architecture. It's not the revolution's fault, but ours.

_________________
Bryce Engstrom:Architect, A.I.A., General Building Contractor
www.engstromarchitecture.com
www.central-coast-project-design-planning-guides.com
Back to top
View user's profileSend private messageVisit poster's website    share:   blogger     del.icio.us     digg     slashdot    
Landy



Joined: 15 Dec 2005
Posts: 457

PostPosted: Fri Dec 12, 2008 5:29 am    Post subject: Reply with quoteFind all posts by Landy

so it's safe to say that Ryugyong hotel looks like something out Michael Graves office?
Back to top
View user's profileSend private message    share:   blogger     del.icio.us     digg     slashdot    
sutcac



Joined: 06 Dec 2008
Posts: 4
Location: Arroyo Grande, CA, USA

PostPosted: Fri Dec 12, 2008 10:00 pm    Post subject: Reply with quoteFind all posts by sutcac

Well, just because they both use vaguely triangular elements based on a couple of snapshots doesn't mean much as far as critiquing them as works of architecture. The are clearly of very different scales.

But I thought your main point was about time. Other than the fact that the Korean project is not finished, what else do you base your support of it as a potential masterpiece on?

Personally, and admittedly on a superficial level as I have not been in either building, I find them both rather hideous.

_________________
Bryce Engstrom:Architect, A.I.A., General Building Contractor
www.engstromarchitecture.com
www.central-coast-project-design-planning-guides.com
Back to top
View user's profileSend private messageVisit poster's website    share:   blogger     del.icio.us     digg     slashdot    
WalkerARCHITECTS



Joined: 25 Sep 2007
Posts: 51

PostPosted: Fri Dec 12, 2008 10:44 pm    Post subject: Reply with quoteFind all posts by WalkerARCHITECTS

Ruskin writes eloquently in the Seven Lamps of Architecture about the relationship between beauty and human virtues. The common man in the US today, in this great democracy of ours, is both convinced of his freedom and simultaneously hopelessly chained to enduring debt. Debt of a scale easily equal to the indentured servitude popular in the original thirteen colonies.

Slavery as an evil conspiracy has somewhat transmogrified over time and distance in western civilization but is subject to a simple philosophical test of the measure of an individual citizens right to choose and elect his government. so although we have not freedom in the most ideal form I must agree with Landy that we have more of it here and now.

The point of architecture however is simply whether or not it is a masterwork in physicality, achieves superb compliance with the law and intelectual constraints of it's time and place and is beautiful enough to bring rapture to the spirit.

I cannot tell from the photo enough regarding any of those three properties to make a declaration about this building. politics aside I like it as an expression of form as shown in this photo. Regarding the building of Mr. Graves, I have been there and it is not among my favorites.
Back to top
View user's profileSend private messageSend e-mail    share:   blogger     del.icio.us     digg     slashdot    
Landy



Joined: 15 Dec 2005
Posts: 457

PostPosted: Sat Dec 13, 2008 5:16 am    Post subject: Reply with quoteFind all posts by Landy

I am not saiyng that the Korean skyscraper is architecture's missing link but I don't think is as bad as the article in the Architectural Record puts it. Put it this way there are far many worst skyscrapers than Ryugyong. And of course there is also time, the thing is that I don't have enough iformation or examples that help me prove my point. However I can remember from the very basics of architectural history that a lot of Baroque, Gothic and many other periods turned into great buildings because they are examples on how different architectural languages meshed together. And to-day architecture is conceived as express product. Should architecture be a product?
Here is an example "Oporto Cathedral" that started sometime in Romanesque and it's Gothic expansion made it complete; How many years did it took?
I believe Ryugyong has that situation, it is a matter of time and the right hands to finish it, Oh and please don't let it be Adrian Smith for architecture's sake and the world's too.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oporto_Cathedral



300px-Terreiro_Se_%28Porto%29.jpg


 

 Filesize:  14.65 KB
 Filename:  300px-Terreiro_Se_%28Porto%29.jpg
 Viewed:  22 Time(s)
Back to top
View user's profileSend private message    share:   blogger     del.icio.us     digg     slashdot    
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic Reply to topic
   ArchitectureWeek DesignCommunity Forum Index » Architecture Forum Page 1 of 1

 




Latest Posts   ·   ArchWeek Jobs Board   ·   Classifieds   ·   User Galleries   ·   Scrapbook   ·   Open 3D Gallery
 Architecture Search   by name of Building, Architect, or Place:  
Buildings     Architects     Types & Styles     Places     Models     GB Image Index     ArchWeek Library
Professional Directory   Web Directory   Competitions   Conferences   Events & Exhibits     Products     Media Kit
DesignCommunity   ·   ArchWeek   ·   Great Buildings   ·   Archiplanet   ·   Books   ·   Blogs   ·   Free 3D   ·   Search
© 2004-2008 Artifice, Inc. · Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
Thème myApple v2.0.1 créé par myTemplate